actors are people not the characters they play
While I'm on a tirade against the misrepresentation of people I had to take a shot at this.
I was watching a Foxtel space-filler that had a few TV celebrities being interviewed on a stage in front of a live crowd (better than a deceased crowd, less flies and stench). The main one I sat through was with Gil Grissom from the original CSI. I'm going to call him Grisson rather than his real name, William L. Petersen, as I don't think Mr Petersen exists anymore. Not to the the general public anyways. The dude is an intelligent, experienced and battle wary all-purpose forensic cop with a sharp mind, wit and an encyclopedic knowledge of, well, pretty much anything.
Well here's our beloved Grissom being interviewed about all manner of things from modern forensic science to the plethora of CSI franchises (not to mention the rip-off shite like NCIS - David McCallum is exempt from my contempt. Illya Kuryakin has done too much for my life's entertainment to be hog-tied over an obvious cash run) to the latest news headlines. Old Grisson gives his point of view in a well thought, slow manner (as we're used to) for all to consume. Trouble is, for me anyways, is that he 'aint fucking Grisson is he? He's some bloke that for all I know write's an 'X' as a signature and goes about off-set with a safety helmet safely strapped on. Seriously, he could have an IQ of 15 on a good day for all we know yet we're happy to sit there and listen to his points of view 'cause we're so fucked up we think he's a character from a TV show?!? I'm not saying he shouldn't give his 2-cents, why shouldn't he? He would have an interesting lifetime experience to offer BUT who's to say it's worth shite? I mean John Cleese is an intelligent, extremely well educated man yet you wouldn't see him in the same situation (until lately that is) because he's the bloke that invented the Ministry of Silly Walks and sold albatros to the crowd at the Hollywood Bowl one night!
All I'm saying is take the messanger at their own merits. The real ones. Not the facade. To be fair to the actors caught up in this modern day illusion, it's not their fault. They didn't propel themselves to this situation (in most cases), nope we did. Our wants drove the mass media to create the product and then we bought into it without realising the reality. Many blame 'the media' like it's some fucking boogey-man but really it's us. The average schmos who unconsciously buy into the unreality as a form of silent protest to the mundane nature of everyday life. Or something like that.
quote for the day:
"I love acting. It is so much more real than life."
- Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
I was watching a Foxtel space-filler that had a few TV celebrities being interviewed on a stage in front of a live crowd (better than a deceased crowd, less flies and stench). The main one I sat through was with Gil Grissom from the original CSI. I'm going to call him Grisson rather than his real name, William L. Petersen, as I don't think Mr Petersen exists anymore. Not to the the general public anyways. The dude is an intelligent, experienced and battle wary all-purpose forensic cop with a sharp mind, wit and an encyclopedic knowledge of, well, pretty much anything.
Well here's our beloved Grissom being interviewed about all manner of things from modern forensic science to the plethora of CSI franchises (not to mention the rip-off shite like NCIS - David McCallum is exempt from my contempt. Illya Kuryakin has done too much for my life's entertainment to be hog-tied over an obvious cash run) to the latest news headlines. Old Grisson gives his point of view in a well thought, slow manner (as we're used to) for all to consume. Trouble is, for me anyways, is that he 'aint fucking Grisson is he? He's some bloke that for all I know write's an 'X' as a signature and goes about off-set with a safety helmet safely strapped on. Seriously, he could have an IQ of 15 on a good day for all we know yet we're happy to sit there and listen to his points of view 'cause we're so fucked up we think he's a character from a TV show?!? I'm not saying he shouldn't give his 2-cents, why shouldn't he? He would have an interesting lifetime experience to offer BUT who's to say it's worth shite? I mean John Cleese is an intelligent, extremely well educated man yet you wouldn't see him in the same situation (until lately that is) because he's the bloke that invented the Ministry of Silly Walks and sold albatros to the crowd at the Hollywood Bowl one night!
All I'm saying is take the messanger at their own merits. The real ones. Not the facade. To be fair to the actors caught up in this modern day illusion, it's not their fault. They didn't propel themselves to this situation (in most cases), nope we did. Our wants drove the mass media to create the product and then we bought into it without realising the reality. Many blame 'the media' like it's some fucking boogey-man but really it's us. The average schmos who unconsciously buy into the unreality as a form of silent protest to the mundane nature of everyday life. Or something like that.
quote for the day:
"I love acting. It is so much more real than life."
- Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)
